Blick in die Zukunft: Alternatives Investieren 2.0

von Fiona Frick, Chief Executive Officer von Unigestion.

In einem Umfeld bestenfalls schwachen Konjunkturwachstums und anhaltend niedriger Zinsen gibt es einen zunehmenden Konsens, dass die Renditen der traditionellen Anlageklassen in den nächsten Jahren unter Druck geraten werden.

Viele Investoren setzen deshalb auf alternative Anlagen, die noch immer ein attraktives risikoadjustiertes Renditepotenzial aufweisen und ein wertvolles Instrument zur Portfoliodiversifikation darstellen. Infolge des Niedrigzinsumfelds sind aber auch die Renditen vieler Hedgefonds-Strategien stark gesunken und haben die Gebührenproblematik ins Blickfeld gerückt.

Unsere Erfahrung hat gezeigt, dass fähige Hedgefonds-Manager auch weiterhin eine wichtige Quelle für die Generierung von unkorreliertem Alpha für langfristig orientierte Investoren sind. Fortschritte bei der quantitativen Modellierung haben die traditionellen Definitionen von Alpha jedoch auf den Prüfstand gestellt und die Möglichkeit für einen kostengünstigeren Zugang zu alternativen Anlagen eröffnet.

Unser Research zeigt, dass eine robuste alternative Anlagelösung anhand eines Core- Exposures in alternativen Risikoprämien entwickelt werden kann, damit Investoren Zugang zum gleichen, breit gefächerten und gut diversifizierten Risikospektrum erhalten, das von vielen Hedgefonds-Strategien genutzt wird. Dies allerdings mit höherer Liquidität, Flexibilität und Transparenz und niedrigeren Kosten.

Diese Lösung kann dann durch ein Exposure zu mehreren sorgfältig ausgewählten Hedgefonds-Managern ergänzt werden, die ein mit diesen Risikofaktoren nicht korreliertes Alpha erzielen können.

Auf das Risikomanagement kommt es an, wenn man in einem derart schwierigen Umfeld Renditen erzielen und die Volatilität effizient steuern will. Entscheidend ist außerdem die Expertise in den einzelnen alternativen Risikoprämien und der leistungsfähigen Allokation in diese Risikoprämien. Letztere sollen auch dem Wechsel der Wirtschaftsphasen Rechnung tragen. Weiter ist die Fähigkeit zur Identifikation und der Zugang zu den kompetentesten Hedgefonds-Managern ein weiteres wichtiges Element.

Hedgefonds-Renditen unter der Lupe

In den vergangenen zehn Jahren haben sich zahlreiche wissenschaftliche Studien mit der These beschäftigt, dass Hedgefonds-Renditen auf das Markt-Beta und -Alpha abzüglich Kosten zurückzuführen sei.

Wissenschaftliche Studien in der vergangenen Dekade haben die Idee hinterfragt, dass Hedgefonds-Erträge aus dem Markt-Beta und –alpha abzüglich Kosten abgeleitet werden kann.

Die Realität ist jedoch differenzierter: Viele Elemente des ursprünglichen Alpha-Konzepts beruhen de facto auf der Existenz differenzierter Risikoprämien, die mit liquiden Anlagestrategien genutzt werden können. Echtes Alpha stellt nach wie vor eine wichtige Komponente dar. Dennoch sollte man neue Wege für die Bewertung alternativer Klammert man das Markt-Beta aus, kann man alternative Anlagerenditen leichter erzielen, wenn man auf eine Kombination folgender Elemente setzt:

  • alternative Risikoprämien durch liquide Anlagestrategien und
  • Alpha durch sorgfältig ausgewählte Hedgefonds mit nachweislicher Managerkompetenz.

Erkenntnisse über die Komponenten von Hedgefonds-Renditen ermöglichen den Aufbau eines optimal diversifizierten Portfolios mit einem Core-Exposure in alternativen Risikoprämien. Dieses wird ergänzt durch einzelne Hedgefonds-Manager, die in der Lage sind, echtes unkorreliertes Alpha für das Portfolio zu generieren.

Im Mittelpunkt von Anlagen in Risikoprämien steht der Gedanke, dass Investoren nicht für die Anlagen vergütet werden, die sie halten, sondern für die Risiken, die sie in Kauf nehmen. Letztere umfassen das Markt-Beta (z.B. die Rendite für das übernommene Aktienmarktrisiko) und alternative Risikoprämien, die eine systematische Erklärung für die Renditen liefern, die ursprünglich als Alpha bezeichnet wurden.

Dank der Einführung komplexerer quantitativer Methoden und Modellen für die Faktoranalyse kann die Theorie inzwischen in die Praxis umgesetzt werden. Darüber hinaus hat die Finanzkrise von 2008 zu neuen Erkenntnissen und Sichtweisen geführt. Die Grenzen zwischen traditionellen und alternativen Anlageklassen verschwimmen zusehends, und immer mehr Investoren wissen inzwischen, dass Diversifikation nicht durch Anlagen in verschiedene Anlageklassen, sondern durch Investments in unterschiedliche Risikofaktoren entsteht, die diesen Anlageklassen zugrunde liegen.

Kombination von Risikoprämie mit Exposure von Hedgefonds

Wir glauben, dass die Nutzung von Risikoprämien und die Generierung von Alpha als unterschiedliche Ansätze zu betrachten sind, die völlig verschiedenen Liquiditätsbedingungen und Preisstrukturen Rechnung tragen.

Investoren sollten eine direkte Allokation zu alternativen Risikoprämien mit mehreren sorgfältig ausgewählten externen Hedgefonds kombinieren, die sich durch ihre Erfolgsbilanz in der Generierung unkorrelierten Alphas ausgezeichnet haben.

So entsteht eine integrierte Lösung für alternative Investments mit Merkmalen, die bei Investoren gefragt sind und viele der Probleme traditioneller Ansätze – hohe Kosten, geringe Liquidität und mangelnde Transparenz – lösen können.

Dies bietet Investoren einen dritten Weg, indem sie nicht einfach von Hedgefonds- Managern abhängen, die alternative Risikoprämien als Alpha betrachten und deshalb eine sehr unterschiedliche Portfoliostruktur produzieren, oder von rein quantitativen Managern, derren Modelle auf historischen Korrelationen beruhen und sich bei Trendwenden an den Märkten als wenig zuverlässig erweisen können.

(i) Aufbau der Core-Exposure in alternativen Risikoprämien

Nicht jedes Risiko wird mit einer Prämie vergütet, so dass erhebliches Research erforderlich ist, wenn man herausfinden will, welche Risikofaktoren nachhaltige und wirtschaftlich sinnvolle Risikoprämien ermöglichen. Unser derzeitiger Kenntnisstand plädiert für Long/Short Equity-Faktoren, Trend-Following- und Carry-Strategien. Allerdings stellen wir diese Schwerpunkte ständig auf den Prüfstand.

Es ist ebenso wichtig, liquide investierbare Portfolios mit attraktiven Risikoeigenschaften zu strukturieren. Da alternative Risikoprämien mit spezifischen Risiken verbunden sind, die für Long/Short-Strategien typisch sind, und Risiken nicht allein durch die Volatilität abgebildet werden können, messen unsere Risikomodelle auch die Asymmetrie sowie das Extrem- und Liquiditätsrisiko. Unsere Erfahrung hat uns gelehrt, dass Risikomanagement der entscheidende Faktor für nachhaltige langfristige Performance ist.

Ausgehend von unserer Einschätzung des derzeitigen gesamtwirtschaftlichen Umfelds und der Sensitivitäten alternativer Risikoprämien zum jeweiligen Wirtschaftszyklus legen wir die effizienteste Kapitalallokation für ein ausgewogenes Exposure zu allen makroökonomischen Konstellationen fest und steuern diese dynamisch.

(ii) Unkorreliertes Alpha durch Hedgefonds hinzufügen

Obwohl dieser Ansatz eine optimale Nutzung alternativer Risikoprämien ermöglicht, bleibt das echte Alpha, das sich nicht durch gängige Risikofaktoren erklären lässt, eine wichtige Quelle für die Generierung unkorrelierter Renditen.

Wir sind der festen Überzeugung, dass Spitzen-Hedgefonds-Manager ein hohes Alpha generieren können. Deshalb ist die Auswahl der Manager ausschlaggebend.

Ausgangsbasis ist die umfassende Analyse der Renditequellen jedes einzelnen Managers anhand von hochentwickelten Modellierungstools. Das Ziel ist dabei eine möglichst niedrige Korrelation mit alternativen Risikoprämien und eine niedrige Korrelation zwischen den einzelnen Managern anzustreben, die für einen robusten Portfolioaufbau im Einzelfall ausgewählt werden.

Die Vergangenheit ist nicht immer eine gute Hilfe für die Zukunft. In einer Welt, wo traditionelle Anlage unter Druck kommen könnten, ist aktives Risikomanagement nötig, um im Marktgeschehen richtig zu navigieren. Das Interesse an alternativen Anlagen wird stark bleiben. Aber es sind neue Wege zu beschreiten, um diese Erträge zu erreichen.

Sorgfältig ausgewählte Hedgefonds-Investments ergänzen ein Core-Exposure in liquiden alternativen Risikoprämien.

"Obtain the higher returns on offer, for the same default risk"

With nearly 40 years of experience, boutique manager Atlanticomnium S.A. approaches bond investing from a different angle than most others. Anthony Smouha, fund manager of the GAM Star Credit Opportunities EUR, describes his approach of investing in quality companies that are unlikely to default and generating returns by investing lower down the capital structure.

What is your fund all about and what differentiates it from your competitors?

The fund is a bond fund and is all about safety and income. Safety from investing in mainly investment grade companies, a steady high income deriving from investing across the capital structure of high quality companies including investing in their junior debt, which pays a higher income. Their junior debt is often sub-investment grade, but what matters to us is the rating of the issuer as reflected by their investment grade ratings. As such, we don’t have to extend the credit risk nor the interest risk. Many of these companies are recognisable national champions with low sensitivity to economic or credit cycles. This is also why we are buy-and-hold investors. We are very selective in terms of the issuers that we have exposure to and don’t need to trade in and out of companies or markets. We are not trying to make capital gains from trading interest rate curves, guessing the five year forward or shorting interest derivatives. The longer we own the securities the better as what matters over time is the predictable and steady carry that the fund captures. As an indication, the fund captures ca. 50bps coupon payments per month or an income of 6% per annum – despite the low interest rate environment. We are what bond investing used to be: invest in a strong company, collect the income and get our money back. The wonderful thing about a bond is that it is predictable. Our performance is driven by the predictable income we earn each month. 

Where we differentiate ourselves is that we are extremely selective in terms of the issuers that we are exposed to as well as the exposure within the capital structure. For example, we have only 10% exposure to AT1 Cocos. We may like the issuers but are cautious on these new securities as their coupons are discretionary and non-cumulative. We prefer to invest selectively within securities issued under Basel II, in securities where coupon has to be paid or in case where deferability is cumulative. The safety comes from the assessment of companies’ fundamentals and investing mainly in Investment Grade companies, which by their nature have a very low default risk. Having managed the fund since 1985, we learned to test the strategy in different market conditions and have learned to stay extremely focused, disciplined and conservative – which are necessary attributes for fixed income investors. There are not many competitors that do what we do. We are not trying to achieve a high return by investing in the bonds of risky companies. By participating in junior or subordinated issues of quality companies, we can obtain the higher returns on offer, for the same default risk.

How do you add value for your investors? 

While many investors seeking high income will find it in the bonds of riskier companies or riskier countries, we invest in safe companies and will invest lower down the capital structure to obtain the higher yield. So the alpha that we bring is not only the issuer selection but also the bond selection.
Issuer selection is bottom-up driven. We want to make sure to invest in safe companies, with strong corporate governance that have the ability and willingness to pay coupon and principal. Junior debt is a non-harmonized market, so bond selection means understanding the contractual obligation set in the prospectus. It is also about understanding how regulatory changes impact these conditions.
Alpha also derives from our suppliers:  we have more than 30 counterparties that we trade with, so we have extremely good access in terms of sourcing and selling securities. Recent regulatory reforms increasing minimum ticket sizes to 100k has made investing bonds less accessible to private individuals. So the fund also gives access to private investors to an extraordinary and diversified pool of issuers and securities which may not be available to many.
The fund has been managed by the same manager for 25 years and the investment management team is capitalizing on their specialist skills. Experience itself adds value in many areas, enabling us to obtain the higher yields often attached to junior or subordinated issues, or those with more complex features, as well as capturing the capital appreciation as the bonds realize their true value.

How do you generate investment ideas?

Our investment universe is very broad and while we invest a high proportion in subordinated debt of financial institutions the strategy also allocates into corporate and corporate hybrid bonds, some high yields and some emerging markets. The determination of regulators to make the financial system safer has resulted in a strong bias to the structurally improving financial sector, but understanding regulatory changes is an important theme. For example, the implementation of Basel III meant that securities issued under Basel II would become a very inefficient form of regulatory capital for issuers since losing over time their eligibility as regulatory capital. So by selecting the right securities, we are not only capturing the higher income, but also should benefit from additional capital gains in case of liability management exercises, when companies buy back their own bonds. As there is for example no new supply, we are also capturing a rarity-premium. Regulatory changes are on-going and as such create on-going opportunities. For example, the Swiss Regulator grandfathered low trigger AT1-Cocos last year, meaning that it would only recognize them as regulatory capital until first call date. As there is no extension risk, one could price these securities to call instead to maturity. So we have perpetual securities that de-facto became dated one, creating interesting opportunities.
At the end of the day, ideas generation are bottom-up driven – meaning that we first need conviction in terms of the issuer. The financial sector comprises hundreds of banks and non-banks ranging from universal banks, to asset managers, real estate companies, brokers, life insurance and non-life insurance companies. In addition to the diversification these provide through their widely divergent business models and balance sheet characteristics, the sophistication and depth of the subordinated universe means a rich and continuously refreshed opportunity set for the strategy.

How is your team structured and who is responsible for the investment decisions?

Our team is experienced heavy and focused with two co-managers working closely together to manage the funds. Decisions therefore are made quickly and brokers like that. Hence, they actively approach us with issues that are either too small for the big houses or too intricate for mainstream investors. Prospectuses are dense documents – I started my career 40 years ago writing prospectuses, and spent an important part of my career as a market maker. Understanding the technical aspects of prospectuses and the ebb and flow of markets provides alpha. For example, when there is some turmoil in markets – and we have seen that numerous times in the past five years – we are able to benefit from the high volatility and can snap up some top-quality bonds with very attractive coupons when they briefly drop significantly in price for just a few hours.

 GAM provides us with full support in terms of operations and distribution. It allows us as managers to concentrate most of our time and efforts on seeking performance for our clients with the knowledge that the investment process is supported by GAM´s extremely strong expertise at all levels; middle-office, back office, valuation, regulation, compliance and administration capabilities.

Another key point is to keep it simple. Our funds are not leveraged. We don’t use derivatives to hedge our positions. Instead, if we don’t like a position anymore because we have some doubts about how it might perform, we will simply sell it. In a complex and uncertain world, where you have at the same time in different parts of the world both inflation and deflation, both growth and recession, both loose and tight monetary policy, it is important to follow a clear strategy.

In which market environment does your investment style work best?

We have been managing the fund since 1985 with a compound return of more than 8% per annum, the bulk coming from coupon payments. 

As we are exposed to national champions that are by nature less sensible to economy or credit cycles, we tend to perform in all types of environment. The higher the cost of equity, the higher the income we can capture as issuing junior debt is a cheaper form of equity-like securities. In addition, these fixed income securities are non-permanent with tax-deductibility advantages so very attractive for both the issuers as well as investors.

During systemic crises we do suffer transitory price volatility and the strategy tends to be correlated to other asset classes for a period of 6-9 months. While at the time the prices may decline, these lay the foundations for future good performance and given the quality of the issuers that we have selected and since we invest in fixed-income securities, we tend to benefit from a quick pull-to-par. Coupon income, which accrues slowly day by day, a 6% coupon or .0135% per day can be overwhelmed by daily prices moves. Those who understand that our fund is coupon driven and that prices recover will enjoy the fruits of being patient. In this sense, systemic crises have worked work well for those who had the patience to stay in the fund. But in a traditional bull/bear market, the strategy tends to be very uncorrelated.

Where do you currently see the best potential and largest risks in the market?

Because of coordinated and excessive monetary easing by central banks, assets are in general expensive. In addition, investors have been forced into taking more duration risk. These are some of the two biggest risks.

As explained earlier, we currently have a strong bias towards the financial sector which is structurally improving following the global financial crisis and still contains huge potential. Taking banks for example, they had to simplify their business model, shutting down risky investment banking and trading departments, and have to use more capital to underpin their remaining activities. The implementation of Basel III meant that more than EUR 400bn additional capital has been built by EU banks and GBP 160bn by UK banks since 2008. The regulatory pressure has been on-going and this is one of the only sectors that can surprise us on the upside in terms of on-going capital build up combined with on-going de-risking activities. What is positive for us is that our legacy junior bonds, which had been issued before the crisis, are now classified as senior to this new core capital. Hence, the ongoing process of balance sheet strengthening has given our holdings a strong boost. 

In terms of valuation, we are still buying at spreads that are significantly wider than fair-value – so not everything is expensive. But one has to be selective. Looking at the top 10 of the securities, we are capturing on average more than 450bps, invested in national champions – compared to EU HY that pays around 250bps for BB issuers! In terms of duration risk, we have naturally mitigated this by investing in securities whereby coupon can be fixed-to-floater or even already a floater. This is why the fund has very low sensitivity to rates and for example had a double digit performance in 2013 – despite tapering. But by the same token, we didn’t really benefit from the declining interest rates and as such the bulk of the performance only came from the high steady income.

Most bond investors see rising rates as a risk. We have mitigated this and remain positioned for higher interest rates, as we have been for some time. One key benefit of investing in junior debt is that these securities – despite being perpetual – can have coupon that are either fixed, fixed-to-floater or already floating. During the portfolio construction, we combine these securities in such a way that we are naturally protected against rising rates. For example, we own discounted floating rates note that could generate up to 30 points capital gains should interest rates rise 100bps and capital gains would offset capital losses that we would experience on fixed-dated securities. We are not afraid of rising rates – to the contrary this scenario would benefit our floating rate notes and fixed-to-float bonds, while our high-yielding fixed-rate bonds would prove fairly resilient. If rates remain at current levels, we will be equally content, since we can continue to lock in the around 6% annual yield of our holdings.

Which aspects of responsible investing do you consider in your investment process?

Responsible investing considerations are integrated within the existing investment management research and analyses processes and such findings form part of the investment decision making process applied.

At the sector level, we avoid controversial sectors such as armaments and casinos, as we believe the credit markets are sufficiently deep and diverse that we do not feel compelled to invest where we are not comfortable being associated with the industry or business. When assessing specific issuers, we consider whether the profile of the issuer is suitable for the portfolio in terms of them being comfortable being associated with them. This assessment will take into account E, S and/ or G factors. One of the key aspects we look at is corporate governance, for example the transparency around corporate behaviour and alignment of key executive’s objectives to the company objectives and results. 

How do you invest your own personal assets?

Investors can take comfort from the fact that we have most of our assets invested in the funds – meaning that we have aligned interests. This is also where we find the best returns on a risk-adjusted basis. 

What do you do in your leisure time? What is your preferred hobby and why?

Golf as it provides the need for technical skill and the need to balance safety and risk. And as with investing, the more you practice, the luckier you get!

About Atlanticomnium
With nearly 40 years of experience, boutique manager Atlanticomnium S.A. approach bond investing from a different angle than most others. While many investors seeking high income will find it in the bonds of more risky companies or countries, Atlanticomnium invest in quality companies and lower down the capital structure to obtain a higher yield. Their investment thesis is based on the fact that investment grade companies rarely default, hence the junior debt of such companies rarely defaults, yet it delivers a more attractive yield.

About ifund
ifund provides fund research, manager selection and asset management based on liquid investment funds. Clients include banks, asset managers, family offices, pension funds and insurance companies in Europe. ifund has signed the UN Principles for Responsible Investment and integrates sustainability criteria in fund analysis. www.ifundservices.cominfo@ifundservices.com, +41 44 286 8000

About altii
alternative investor information (altii – altii.com) is the digital marketing and online portal for all asset management strategies in the German-speaking regions (D/A/CH). altii is focusing on institutional investors and has a public and a product area. For investors the service is free of charge. The portal www.altii.de/en is supported by a targeted newsletter and through clear social media campaigns. www.altii.cominfo@altii.de@altii_news,+49 69 57708987

“Our approach has delivered consistent results for many, many years!”

Mark E. Stoeckle, Chief Executive Officer and Senior Portfolio Manager, talks in an interview with altii about the core strategies Adams Funds offers and especially the team and investment approach of the US small cap product, the UBAM Adams small cap fund, that they sub­advise for UBP.

altii: Mark right now you are visiting clients in Europe. Since two weeks you are on travel and today you came to Frankfurt am Main, Germany. Thank you for stopping by for an interview. Please tell us about Adams Funds, your core strategies and the reasons for being here.

Mark E. Stoeckle: Thanks for taking the time to speak to me Christian. Adams Funds is composed of three strategies. We run two closed-end funds, a US large cap fund and an Energy and Materials fund and sub-advise a US small cap fund for UBP. The two closed-end funds, Adams Diversified Equity Fund (ADX) and Adams Natural Resources Fund (PEO), have traded on the New York Stock Exchange since 1929. So we have a very long history of helping our investors reach their investment goals. The US small cap product that we sub-advise for UBP is a very exciting opportunity. Shortly after I joined Adams, I was contacted by a former investor in the small cap fund I ran at BNP Paribas. He was looking for a US small cap product that was run the same way that we ran the BNP product. He was so interested in our philosophy, process and performance that he offered to provide seed funding for the fund. The only catch was he needed to invest in a UCITS fund so we needed to find a company to sponsor the fund. I quickly called an old colleague at UBP looking for some advice and he stated that, because he was very familiar with me and the product that UBP would be interested in being the fund sponsor. So, on 14 October 2015 we launched the fund with $50 million. Our relationship and support with UBP has been great. We are looking forward to growing the fund throughout Europe and Asia.

altii: Who is in the team with you?

Mark: The UBAM Adams small cap fund has the benefit of having a very experienced portfolio management team. Working with me as portfolio managers on the fund are Jim Haynie and Mike Rega. The three of us ran this same product for nine years at BNP Paribas. In addition to the portfolio managers, we have seven very good analysts working with us. We established a very enviable track record at BNP and have every expectation that will continue with the UBP fund.

altii: What qualifies your investment approach?

Mark: Our core beliefs center on discipline, systematic analysis, sector and industry group neutrality as well as careful attention to risk management. We begin our process by using the Russell 2000 as our investment universe. For risk purposes we eliminate any stock trading below $100 million market cap as well as stocks that are illiquid. We then run our quantitative model on the 1200 stocks that make it through the market cap and liquidity screens. The model is a great tool to reduce the universe to a group of stocks that have fundamental characteristics we admire. That leaves us with about 500 stocks from which we perform our fundamental research. Our fundamental research focuses on a company’s ability to generate sustainable earnings at a fair valuation. Our attention to valuation has, over time, allowed us to put together a portfolio that has similar earnings growth of the Russell 2000 but at a significant valuation discount. Once we’ve found stocks that are well ranked by our quantitative model and have earnings and valuation that are attractive we then evaluate how much risk we want to take in each sector. For this portion of the process we assign a risk score to each stock in a sector. We rank them from least risky to most risky then break them into industry groups. This allows us to know exactly where sector risk resides. We then determine where we want to take risk within the sector. The most important part of this portion of the process is we consciously know where we are taking risk within the sector. This is a unique aspect to our process.

altii: Why should the German Institutional Investor invest into your strategy?

Mark: This product was built to deliver US small cap performance and characteristics by investing in high quality, small cap stocks. Our approach is one that has delivered consistent results for many, many years. We believe there is a strong argument to be made to have a permanent allocation to small cap within a German investors’ US allocation. Over time, small cap stocks outperform large cap stocks. For this reason we believe that the consistency and un-correlated nature of small caps is powerful and should be very carefully considered.

altii: How will you keep the contact to the investors later on?

Mark: I am meeting with you and the investors on my second roadshow this year. We expect to continue to make trips to see our investors in person. We are committed to give access for our investors as well as to provide transparency. Our partner UBP has a great salesforce as well as Investment Specialists. We have a monthly call with UBP to discuss the portfolio so that the sales people and Investment Specialists are well informed for our investors. In addition, we are looking into video conferences and conference calls to keep our investors up-to-date on the fund. The video conferences, conference calls and bi-annual roadshows will allow us to stay close to our investors.

altii: Thank you for the interview.

About Adams Funds
Adams Funds is composed of two of the country's oldest closed­ end equity funds, Adams Diversified Equity Fund (ADX) and Adams Natural Resources Fund (PEO), as well as a US Small Cap sub­advised fund. As closed­end funds, shares of ADX and PEO common stock are listed on the New York Stock Exchange and have traded there since 1929.
For over 85 years, both ADX and PEO have been internally managed and have generated capital growth and income through portfolio performance, dividends, and distributions. All three funds are managed by an experienced team employing a disciplined approach to identify investment opportunities and carefully manage risk.
ADX and PEO have paid dividends for over 80 years and are committed to an annual distribution rate of at least 6%.
adamsfunds.com

About Union Bancaire Privée (UBP)
UBP is one of Switzerland’s leading private banks, and is amongst the best­capitalised, with a Tier 1 ratio of 22.3% as at 30 June 2016. The Bank specialises in wealth management for both private and institutional clients. It is based in Geneva and employs some 1,680 people across twenty­four locations worldwide; as at 30 June 2016, it held CHF 113.5 billion in assets under management. Its asset management business focuses on strategic investment themes across different asset classes including European Equities, Convertibles, Global Fixed Income, Emerging Debt and Equities as well as alternative investments.

Contact details:
Peter Richters
Head of Institutional Business
UBP Zurich Branch
+41 58 819 8337
peter.richters@ubp.ch

About altii
alternative investor information (altii – altii.com) is the digital marketing and online portal for all asset management strategies in the German-speaking regions (D/A/CH). altii is focusing on institutional investors and has a public and a product area. For investors the service is free of charge. The portal www.altii.de/en is supported by a targeted newsletter and through clear social media campaigns. www.altii.cominfo@altii.de@altii_news,+49 69 57708987