Initiation of Coverage: Bitcoin (BTC_EUR)

Key Data & Forecast Snapshot

• Rating: BUY
• 12-Month Target Price: €139,000
• Current Price (as of [Current Date]): €76,705
• Implied Upside: 81.2%

Current Market Data (Source: CoinGecko)

• Current Price: €76,705
• Market Capitalization: €1,533,258,073,385
• 24h Trading Volume: €42,245,110,443
• 24h Price Change: +1.50%

12-Month Forecast Calculation

Our 12-month target price of €139,000 is based on external projections and our assessment of continued institutional adoption and scarcity dynamics.
For instance, Nasdaq has reported a prediction of $150,000 for a single Bitcoin within one year (Source: Nasdaq).

Calculation: $150,000 * 0.926 EUR/USD (assumed exchange rate) = €138,900. Rounded to €139,000.

Implied Upside: ((€139,000 – €76,705) / €76,705) * 100% = 81.2%

Investment Thesis

We initiate coverage on Bitcoin (BTC_EUR) with a BUY rating and a 12-month price target of €139,000. Bitcoin stands at a critical juncture, transitioning from a niche digital asset to a recognized institutional store of value. The confluence of increasing institutional adoption, its immutable scarcity profile reinforced by predictable halving events, and its growing network effect underpins our bullish outlook. The recent approval and success of spot Bitcoin ETFs globally have catalyzed significant inflows from traditional finance, validating Bitcoin’s role as a legitimate asset class. We believe Bitcoin is structurally positioned for continued upside as it further integrates into global financial portfolios and strengthens its “digital gold” narrative against a backdrop of ongoing macroeconomic uncertainty and fiat debasement concerns.

Investment Positives

We see several key drivers for Bitcoin’s continued appreciation:

• Accelerating Institutional Adoption

  The launch of spot Bitcoin ETFs in major jurisdictions has dramatically lowered barriers to entry for institutional investors, wealth managers, and corporate treasuries. Firms like Cantor Fitzgerald and State Street Global Advisors (SSGA) anticipate and observe continued and increased institutional interest and adoption through 2025 and 2026 (Source: Pymnts.com, SSGA.com). This influx of capital from regulated entities provides significant demand-side pressure.

• Immutable Scarcity and Halving Dynamics

  Bitcoin’s fixed supply cap of 21 million coins and its programmatic halving events, which reduce the rate of new supply issuance approximately every four years, create inherent scarcity. This predictable supply shock historically acts as a catalyst for price appreciation, reinforcing Bitcoin’s value proposition as a deflationary asset in an inflationary world.

• Digital Gold Narrative and Macro Hedge

  Bitcoin increasingly functions as a “digital gold,” offering a decentralized, censorship-resistant alternative to traditional safe-haven assets. Its uncorrelated nature (over longer time horizons) and hedge against inflation/fiat currency devaluation appeal to investors seeking portfolio diversification and protection against macroeconomic instability.

• Robust Network Security and Decentralization

  Bitcoin’s Proof-of-Work (PoW) consensus mechanism ensures unparalleled security and decentralization, making it resilient to censorship and manipulation. The global network of miners and nodes contributes to its integrity, fostering trust and making it the most secure and liquid cryptocurrency.

• Evolving Ecosystem and Scalability Solutions

  While primarily a store of value, Bitcoin’s ecosystem continues to evolve. Layer-2 solutions like the Lightning Network enhance its transactional capabilities, enabling faster and cheaper payments. This ongoing innovation could broaden Bitcoin’s utility and appeal beyond its core “digital gold” function.

Competitive/Peer Analysis

Bitcoin vs. Gold (BTC_EUR vs. XAU_EUR)

• Similarities:

  • Store of Value: Both are considered stores of value, especially during economic uncertainty.
  • Scarcity: Both have finite supplies (though gold’s is estimated, Bitcoin’s is mathematically fixed).
  • Inflation Hedge: Investors often turn to both as a hedge against inflation and currency debasement.

• Differences:

  • Physical vs. Digital: Gold is a physical commodity, requiring storage and incurring costs. Bitcoin is purely digital, easily transferable and verifiable.
  • Divisibility: Bitcoin is highly divisible (down to 8 decimal places), facilitating micro-transactions. Gold is less so.
  • Portability: Bitcoin can be transferred globally almost instantly and without permission. Gold requires physical transportation or trusted custodians.
  • Verifiability: Bitcoin’s authenticity is cryptographically verifiable by anyone. Gold requires specialized testing.
  • Censorship Resistance: Bitcoin transactions are permissionless. Gold can be seized or subject to government control.

Bitcoin vs. Ethereum (BTC_EUR vs. ETH_EUR)

• Core Purpose:

  • Bitcoin (BTC): Primarily designed as a decentralized, scarce digital currency and store of value – “digital gold.”
  • Ethereum (ETH): A smart contract platform enabling decentralized applications (dApps), NFTs, and decentralized finance (DeFi) – often referred to as “digital oil” for its utility.

• Consensus Mechanism:

  • Bitcoin: Proof-of-Work (PoW), prioritizing security and decentralization over transaction speed.
  • Ethereum: Transitioned to Proof-of-Stake (PoS) with “The Merge,” focusing on energy efficiency and scalability.

• Monetary Policy:

  • Bitcoin: Fixed supply cap (21 million) with predictable halvings, making it deflationary.
  • Ethereum: Dynamic supply, with recent upgrades making it potentially deflationary through transaction fee burning, but no fixed cap.

• Investment Thesis:

  • Bitcoin: Value largely driven by its scarcity, network security, and adoption as a macro asset.
  • Ethereum: Value derived from its utility as a platform for innovation, developer activity, and dApp usage.

Estimates & Operating Assumptions

Our forward estimates are based on the expectation of continued global institutional adoption, increasing regulatory clarity, and Bitcoin’s inherent scarcity model. These assumptions drive projected price appreciation and network activity growth.

Key Operating Assumptions (2025E – 2027E)

• Institutional Integration: We assume a continued acceleration of Bitcoin’s integration into traditional finance, including increased allocations from institutional funds, sovereign wealth funds, and corporate treasuries.
• Regulatory Environment: We anticipate gradual but meaningful progress in global regulatory clarity (e.g., further expansion of ETF products, clearer taxation guidelines), reducing uncertainty and fostering broader participation.
• Macroeconomic Backdrop: Our estimates assume a macro environment characterized by persistent inflation concerns, increasing national debts, and potential for further fiat currency debasement, reinforcing Bitcoin’s appeal as a hard asset.
• Technological Advancement: Ongoing development of scaling solutions (e.g., Lightning Network) and underlying protocol enhancements will gradually improve Bitcoin’s transaction efficiency and expand its potential use cases.
• Halving Cycle: Our estimates incorporate the historical impact of Bitcoin’s halving events, with price appreciation typically following reduced new supply.

Forward Estimates (Illustrative)

• 2025E

  • Average Price: €95,000 – €110,000
  • Network Transaction Volume Growth: +20-30% YoY (driven by increased institutional movement and Layer 2 adoption)
  • Active Addresses Growth: +15-25% YoY (reflecting broader user base and institutional engagement)

• 2026E

  • Average Price: €115,000 – €135,000
  • Network Transaction Volume Growth: +15-25% YoY (continued scaling and payment integration)
  • Active Addresses Growth: +10-20% YoY (maturing user base, wider retail accessibility)

• 2027E

  • Average Price: €120,000 – €145,000
  • Network Transaction Volume Growth: +10-20% YoY (stable growth, potential for new use cases)
  • Active Addresses Growth: +5-15% YoY (market maturation, deeper penetration)

Note: Circulating supply is assumed to increase predictably according to Bitcoin’s issuance schedule. Market Capitalization estimates are derived from these price forecasts and the projected circulating supply.

Valuation

Valuing Bitcoin differs from traditional equity analysis due to its unique characteristics. We consider a combination of scarcity-based models, network valuation metrics, and comparative analysis.

• Stock-to-Flow (S2F) Model

  Methodology: The S2F model (pioneered by PlanB) values Bitcoin based on its scarcity, comparing the existing supply (stock) to the annual new supply (flow). Assets with a higher S2F ratio are considered scarcer and historically have commanded higher prices. Bitcoin’s halvings significantly increase its S2F ratio.
  
  Implication: The model suggests a strong correlation between scarcity and value. Given Bitcoin’s fixed supply and programmed halvings, the S2F model projects significant long-term upside potential, validating the “digital gold” narrative. While not a perfect predictor, it highlights the fundamental impact of supply mechanics.

• Network Value to Transactions (NVT) Ratio

  Methodology: Analogous to a Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratio for traditional assets, the NVT ratio divides Bitcoin’s market capitalization (Network Value) by the daily USD transaction volume on the blockchain.
  
  Implication: A lower NVT can suggest undervaluation relative to network utility, while a higher NVT might indicate overvaluation or speculative interest. Monitoring the NVT ratio against historical trends helps assess whether Bitcoin’s current market price is justified by its underlying network activity and utility. Sustained growth in transaction volume without a proportional increase in market cap could imply a favorable buying opportunity.

• Network Effects (Metcalfe’s Law)

  Methodology: Metcalfe’s Law suggests that the value of a telecommunications network is proportional to the square of the number of connected users. Applied to Bitcoin, this relates to the growing number of active addresses, users, developers, and integrated services.
  
  Implication: As more individuals and institutions adopt, use, and build upon Bitcoin, its network effect strengthens, increasing its intrinsic value. Growth in metrics like active addresses, transaction counts, and the hash rate (indicating network security) signifies a robust and expanding network, which supports a higher valuation over time.

Key Risks

Investing in Bitcoin carries substantial risks, which investors must carefully consider:

• Regulatory Uncertainty and Crackdown

  Governments globally may impose restrictive regulations, outright bans, or introduce unfavorable tax policies. The lack of a unified global regulatory framework creates uncertainty and can trigger significant market volatility. While EU MiCA brings some clarity, major jurisdictions like the US still navigate a complex landscape.

• Extreme Price Volatility

  Bitcoin is known for its high price volatility, driven by market sentiment, macroeconomic factors, geopolitical events, and speculative trading. Rapid and significant price swings can lead to substantial losses.

• Technological Risks

  While robust, Bitcoin faces potential risks such as critical software bugs, 51% attacks (though increasingly improbable for Bitcoin’s scale), or long-term threats from quantum computing development that could compromise its cryptography. Security breaches on exchanges or custodial services also pose risks to individual holdings.

• Competition from Other Cryptocurrencies and CBDCs

  Bitcoin faces competition from other cryptocurrencies (altcoins) that offer different features or improvements. Additionally, the development and potential adoption of Central Bank Digital Currencies (CBDCs) by national governments could introduce new forms of digital currency competition.

• Macroeconomic Headwinds

  Adverse macroeconomic conditions, such as high interest rates, recessions, or a flight to traditional safe-haven assets, could dampen investor appetite for riskier assets like Bitcoin, leading to price declines (as indicated by “bearish liquidity pressures” in market news).

• Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) Concerns

  The energy consumption of Bitcoin’s Proof-of-Work mining continues to be a point of contention. Growing ESG pressures from institutional investors and regulators could lead to negative sentiment or further restrictions, impacting adoption.

Appendix

Disclaimer: This report is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. The views and forecasts expressed herein are based on publicly available information and internal models, and are subject to change without notice. Investing in cryptocurrencies involves substantial risk, including the risk of complete loss. Investors should conduct their own due diligence and consult with a qualified financial advisor.

AI-Generated Content Disclosure: This report was generated by an AI assistant based on the provided prompt, market data, and news. While efforts were made to ensure accuracy and align with the requested style, it may not reflect the nuanced judgment of a human analyst or real-time market developments beyond the provided data.

Important Note / Wichtiger Hinweis:

EN: This report may contain AI-assisted analysis or be generated entirely by AI, which processes market data from publicly available sources for which altii accepts no responsibility for its accuracy. We strongly advise against using this report as a basis for investment decisions. Description of the altii BTC report.

DE: Dieser Bericht kann KI-gestützte Analysen enthalten oder vollständig von KI erstellt worden sein, die Marktdaten aus öffentlich zugänglichen Quellen verarbeitet, für deren Richtigkeit altii keine Verantwortung übernimmt. Wir raten dringend davon ab, diesen Bericht als Grundlage für Anlageentscheidungen zu verwenden. Zur Beschreibung des altii-BTC-Reports.