Initiation of Coverage: Bitcoin EUR (BTC_EUR)

1. Key Data & Forecast Snapshot

Ticker: BTC_EUR
Asset Class: Digital Asset / Store of Value

Live Market Data

• Current Price: €76,586
• Market Cap: €1,530,068,913,412.07
• 24h Volume: €51,185,793,155.81
• 24h Change: -2.01%

12-Month Forecast

• 12m Target Price: €105,000
• Implied Upside: +37.1% (Calculation: (€105,000 / €76,586) – 1)
• Circulating Supply (estimated): 19,978,574 BTC (Calculation: €1,530,068,913,412.07 / €76,586)
• 12m Target Market Cap: €2,097,750,270,000 (Calculation: €105,000 * 19,978,574)
• Key Drivers: Accelerating institutional adoption (spot ETFs), post-halving supply shock, sustained macroeconomic uncertainty fueling demand for alternative assets.

2. Investment Thesis

We initiate coverage on Bitcoin (BTC_EUR) with a 12-month target price of €105,000. Bitcoin is transitioning from a speculative digital asset to a globally recognized macroeconomic asset, driven primarily by unprecedented institutional adoption and its unique monetary policy. The recent approval of spot Bitcoin ETFs in major jurisdictions has opened the floodgates for traditional capital, validating Bitcoin’s legitimacy and significantly improving access for a broader investor base. Combined with the immutable supply cap and the upcoming “halving” event, which further constricts new supply, Bitcoin is poised for a significant re-rating as a store of value asset comparable to, and in some respects superior to, gold.

Why Now?

• Institutional Integration: Spot Bitcoin ETFs facilitate direct, regulated exposure for institutional investors, pension funds, and wealth managers, leading to sustained capital inflows and deeper market liquidity.
• Supply Scarcity & Halving: The programmed halving event in April 2024 will reduce the new supply of Bitcoin by 50%, historically preceding significant price appreciation due to increased scarcity against rising demand.
• Digital Gold Narrative Strengthening: Amidst global geopolitical instability, inflationary pressures, and sovereign debt concerns, Bitcoin’s characteristics as a decentralized, censorship-resistant, and finite asset reinforce its appeal as a hedge and store of value.
• Network Security & Resilience: Bitcoin’s robust proof-of-work mechanism and global distributed network provide unparalleled security and immutability, proven over more than a decade of operation.
• Growing Retail & Corporate Adoption: While institutional flows dominate headlines, a resilient base of retail holders (evident by low spending rates) and increasing corporate treasury allocations further underpin demand.

3. Investment Positives

1. Accelerating Institutional Adoption & Accessibility

• Spot ETF Inflows: Recent approvals of spot Bitcoin ETFs in the US have generated billions in net inflows, signaling a structural shift in how institutions and retail investors access Bitcoin. This trend is expected to continue as more platforms integrate these products.
• Corporate Treasury Integration: Companies like MicroStrategy continue to aggressively accumulate Bitcoin, viewing it as a strategic reserve asset that hedges against inflation and dollar debasement.
• Regulatory Clarity: The establishment of regulated investment vehicles provides a clear pathway for compliance-conscious institutions to allocate capital to Bitcoin.

2. Inherent Scarcity & Deflationary Monetary Policy

• Programmed Halving: The upcoming halving event in April 2024 will reduce the daily issuance of new Bitcoin from 6.25 BTC to 3.125 BTC per block, effectively cutting the new supply in half. This supply shock, combined with steady or increasing demand, historically leads to price appreciation.
• Fixed Supply Cap: Bitcoin’s hard cap of 21 million coins ensures absolute scarcity, differentiating it from fiat currencies subject to inflationary policies. Approximately 94.6% of the total supply is already mined (as of early 2024).

3. Macroeconomic Tailwinds & Geopolitical Hedge

• Inflation Hedge: Bitcoin has increasingly been viewed as a hedge against inflation and currency debasement, particularly in periods of expansionary monetary policy.
• Geopolitical Neutrality: As a decentralized asset, Bitcoin offers a neutral financial rail, attractive in regions experiencing political instability or capital controls.
• Demographic Shift: Younger generations show a higher propensity to adopt digital assets, suggesting long-term demand growth as wealth transfers occur.

4. Robust Network Security and Technological Resilience

• Proof-of-Work Dominance: Bitcoin’s highly decentralized and energy-intensive proof-of-work consensus mechanism provides unparalleled security against attacks, demonstrated by over a decade of uninterrupted operation.
• Layer 2 Solutions: Developments such as the Lightning Network continue to enhance Bitcoin’s scalability and utility for micro-transactions, broadening its practical applications without compromising base-layer security.

4. Competitive/Peer Analysis

Bitcoin vs. Gold

• Similarities: Both are considered scarce, durable, and unproducible store-of-value assets. Both have historically served as hedges against inflation and economic uncertainty.
• Bitcoin Advantages:
  • Digital Native: Easily divisible, portable across borders at low cost, and verifiable on a public ledger.
  • Absolute Scarcity: Fixed supply cap of 21 million coins, compared to gold’s unknown but increasing supply.
  • Censorship Resistance: Transactions are peer-to-peer and immutable, without central authority.
  • Lower Storage/Transfer Costs: Significant advantage over physical gold’s storage, insurance, and transport expenses.
• Gold Advantages:
  • Longer History: Millennia of established trust and cultural acceptance as money.
  • Physical Tangibility: Preferred by some investors for its physical presence.
  • Lower Volatility: Historically less volatile than Bitcoin, though this gap may narrow with institutionalization.
• Conclusion: Bitcoin offers a digitally native, superior form of scarcity and portability compared to gold, positioning it as “digital gold” for the 21st century.

Bitcoin vs. Ethereum (ETH)

• Similarities: Both are leading cryptocurrencies by market capitalization, with large and active developer communities.
• Bitcoin Focus: Primarily designed as a decentralized, immutable store of value and peer-to-peer electronic cash system. Its script is intentionally limited for security and stability.
• Ethereum Focus: A programmable blockchain platform designed for smart contracts and decentralized applications (dApps), forming the foundation of Web3. Its primary utility is as “gas” for computations on its network.
• Key Differences:
  • Monetary Policy: Bitcoin has a fixed supply cap and predictable halving schedule. Ethereum transitioned to Proof-of-Stake (PoS) with a dynamic, often deflationary, supply mechanism but without a hard cap.
  • Use Case: Bitcoin as “digital gold”; Ethereum as “world computer.”
  • Market Cap: Bitcoin maintains a significantly larger market capitalization, reflecting its role as the industry’s base layer and primary store of value.
  • Volatility: Ethereum typically exhibits higher volatility due to its broader utility and more dynamic development roadmap.
• Conclusion: Bitcoin and Ethereum are complementary rather than direct competitors. Bitcoin serves as the foundational store of value, while Ethereum powers the decentralized application layer.

5. Estimates & Operating Assumptions (3-Year Forward Looking)

Our estimates for Bitcoin are driven by network adoption, supply dynamics, and the macro environment rather than traditional revenue metrics. (Estimates based on general market consensus and historical patterns for 2024-2026).

Key Metrics & Assumptions

• Circulating Supply:
  • 2024: ~19.68 million BTC (post-halving reduction in new issuance)
  • 2025: ~19.86 million BTC
  • 2026: ~20.04 million BTC
  • Assumption: Supply increases predictably until the 21 million cap is reached around 2140. Halving in April 2024 significantly impacts new supply flow.
• Institutional AUM in BTC Products:
  • 2024: Expected to exceed €100 billion (driven by Spot ETF growth and corporate adoption).
  • 2025: Growth of 30-50% year-over-year.
  • 2026: Continued robust growth as asset allocators increase exposure.
  • Assumption: Traditional finance slowly but steadily increases allocation to Bitcoin as a legitimate asset class.
• Active Addresses / Network Users:
  • 2024: Steady increase, driven by greater accessibility via ETFs and broader awareness.
  • 2025-2026: Continued expansion, potentially accelerating with further mainstream adoption and usability improvements (e.g., Layer 2 scaling).
  • Assumption: Network effects continue to draw new participants globally.
• Hash Rate & Network Security:
  • 2024-2026: Expected to continue increasing, reflecting heightened miner competition and network security. Post-halving, some consolidation among less efficient miners may occur, but overall security will remain robust.
  • Assumption: The network remains highly secure and resilient against attacks.
• Regulatory Environment:
  • 2024-2026: Gradual movement towards clearer regulatory frameworks in major jurisdictions, reducing uncertainty. Isolated instances of restrictive regulation may still emerge but are unlikely to impact global adoption significantly.
  • Assumption: Regulation moves towards legitimization rather than outright prohibition in key markets.

6. Valuation

Valuing Bitcoin differs from traditional equity analysis due to its lack of cash flows. We employ a combination of scarcity-based models, network effects, and comparative analysis to derive our target price.

Network Value to Transactions (NVT) Ratio

• Concept: Analogous to a Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratio, NVT compares Bitcoin’s market capitalization (Network Value) to its on-chain transaction volume (proxy for “utility” or “revenue”).
• Interpretation:
  • A rising NVT ratio without a corresponding increase in transaction volume can signal potential overvaluation.
  • A falling NVT ratio, especially during periods of high price growth, might suggest undervaluation or increasing network utility.
• Current State: Recent price surges driven by ETF inflows have elevated Bitcoin’s NVT. However, the qualitative shift to institutional adoption suggests that previous NVT benchmarks may need re-evaluation, as value accrual is increasingly driven by store-of-value demand rather than solely transaction utility. We believe the current NVT, while appearing high by historical standards, reflects this fundamental shift in market structure.

Stock-to-Flow (S2F) Model

• Concept: The S2F model values an asset based on its scarcity, comparing its existing supply (“stock”) to the rate at which new supply is created (“flow”). Assets with high S2F ratios (like gold) tend to have higher value.
• Bitcoin & Halving: Bitcoin’s S2F ratio dramatically increases with each halving event. The upcoming April 2024 halving will further elevate Bitcoin’s S2F, making it significantly scarcer.
• Implication: Historically, Bitcoin’s price has closely tracked its S2F model, particularly post-halving. While the model is not without its critics, it provides a strong framework for understanding the impact of Bitcoin’s programmed scarcity on its long-term value. Our 12-month target price implicitly accounts for the positive S2F impact of the upcoming halving.

Network Effects (Metcalfe’s Law)

• Concept: Metcalfe’s Law states that the value of a telecommunications network is proportional to the square of the number of connected users. While difficult to quantify precisely for Bitcoin, the principle applies.
• Application to Bitcoin:
  • Growing User Base: Increasing active addresses, wallet downloads, and exchange users.
  • Expanding Infrastructure: Growth of exchanges, payment processors, custodian services, and Layer 2 solutions.
  • Increased Adoption: More institutions, corporations, and even sovereign entities recognizing Bitcoin.
• Implication: As more participants enter the Bitcoin ecosystem (driven by institutional access and improved UX), the network’s value and utility increase exponentially. This self-reinforcing loop is a fundamental driver of Bitcoin’s long-term appreciation.

Target Price Derivation

Our €105,000 12-month target price is derived from a synthesis of these valuation frameworks:

• Post-Halving Scarcity: The S2F model suggests a significant re-pricing upward as new supply is cut.
• Institutional Capital Inflows: Assuming continued net inflows into spot ETFs, a new floor for demand is being established, pushing prices higher than previous cycles.
• Macroeconomic Climate: Persistent inflation, geopolitical uncertainty, and fiat currency debasement concerns continue to drive demand for a decentralized store of value.
• Historical Cycle Patterns: While past performance is not indicative of future results, Bitcoin has historically seen significant appreciation in the 12-18 months following a halving event.

7. Key Risks

1. Regulatory Uncertainty

• Global Patchwork: The lack of a harmonized global regulatory framework creates uncertainty. Specific jurisdictions may introduce restrictive policies or outright bans, impacting market access and liquidity.
• Taxation: Evolving tax laws regarding digital assets can create compliance burdens and discourage investment.

2. Technological Risks

• Quantum Computing: The theoretical threat of quantum computers undermining Bitcoin’s cryptographic security, though practical application remains distant.
• Protocol Vulnerabilities: While Bitcoin’s core protocol is robust, undiscovered bugs or vulnerabilities could emerge, leading to network instability or loss of funds.
• Scaling Challenges: Although Layer 2 solutions are developing, significant increases in demand could strain network capacity if scalability solutions do not keep pace.

3. Market Volatility & Drawdowns

• Price Swings: Bitcoin is historically highly volatile, susceptible to rapid price fluctuations and significant drawdowns (50%+ is not uncommon).
• Liquidity Shocks: Large liquidations or sudden shifts in market sentiment can trigger cascading price declines.

4. Macroeconomic Headwinds

• Interest Rate Hikes: Sustained periods of high interest rates or quantitative tightening can reduce investor appetite for risk assets, including Bitcoin.
• Global Recession: A severe global economic downturn could lead to capital flight from all asset classes, including digital assets.

5. Competition & Innovation

• Other Cryptocurrencies: While Bitcoin has established dominance as a store of value, emerging blockchain technologies or “Bitcoin killers” could theoretically challenge its position, albeit unlikely in the near term for its core use case.
• Central Bank Digital Currencies (CBDCs): Government-backed digital currencies could introduce competition for digital payments, although their design intent differs significantly from Bitcoin’s decentralized ethos.

6. Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) Concerns

• Energy Consumption: Bitcoin’s Proof-of-Work mechanism consumes significant energy, drawing criticism from environmental groups and potentially leading to regulatory pressure.
• Mining Centralization: While decentralized in principle, mining power could theoretically centralize, raising concerns about network integrity, though this has proven resilient.

8. Appendix

Background on Bitcoin

Bitcoin is a decentralized digital currency, without a central bank or single administrator, that can be sent from user to user on the peer-to-peer bitcoin network without the need for intermediaries. It was invented in 2008 by an unknown entity using the name Satoshi Nakamoto and released as open-source software in 2009.

• Proof-of-Work (PoW): The consensus mechanism used to validate transactions and create new blocks on the blockchain. Miners compete to solve complex cryptographic puzzles, securing the network.
• Halving: A programmed event within Bitcoin’s code that occurs approximately every four years (or every 210,000 blocks), which halves the reward for mining new blocks. This reduces the rate at which new Bitcoins are introduced into circulation, increasing scarcity.
• Fixed Supply: The total supply of Bitcoin is capped at 21 million coins, ensuring its deflationary nature.

Compliance Language

This report is for informational purposes only and does not constitute an offer to sell or a solicitation of an offer to buy any securities or other financial instruments. The information contained herein has been obtained from sources believed to be reliable but is not necessarily complete and its accuracy cannot be guaranteed. Any opinions expressed are subject to change without notice. Investing in digital assets carries significant risks, including the potential loss of principal. Investors should conduct their own due diligence and consult with a qualified financial advisor before making any investment decisions.

This report has been generated by an AI assistant based on provided market data, news, and internal analytical models.

Important Note / Wichtiger Hinweis:

EN: This report may contain AI-assisted analysis or be generated entirely by AI, which processes market data from publicly available sources for which altii accepts no responsibility for its accuracy. We strongly advise against using this report as a basis for investment decisions. Description of the altii BTC report.

DE: Dieser Bericht kann KI-gestützte Analysen enthalten oder vollständig von KI erstellt worden sein, die Marktdaten aus öffentlich zugänglichen Quellen verarbeitet, für deren Richtigkeit altii keine Verantwortung übernimmt. Wir raten dringend davon ab, diesen Bericht als Grundlage für Anlageentscheidungen zu verwenden. Zur Beschreibung des altii-BTC-Reports.