Initiation of Coverage: Bitcoin (BTC_EUR)

1. Key Data & Forecast Snapshot

Recommendation: BUY

12-Month Price Target: €115,000

Upside/Downside: +54.7%

• Current Price: €74336
• Market Cap: €1485162079885.0647
• 24h Volume: €41296093651.15595
• 24h Change: -0.365208028028238%

Key Drivers for Price Target:

• Accelerating institutional adoption, driven by regulated investment vehicles (e.g., ETFs).
• Bitcoin’s continued emergence as a macro hedge against global monetary expansion and inflation.
• Supply scarcity amplified by the recent halving event, restricting new supply against rising demand.
• Robust and expanding network effects, underpinning long-term value.

Key Risks:

• Increased regulatory scrutiny or outright bans in major economies.
• Persistent price volatility impacting investor sentiment.
• Potential for significant macroeconomic downturns reducing risk appetite.
• Emergence of competing digital assets or technological shifts.

2. Investment Thesis

We initiate coverage of Bitcoin (BTC_EUR) with a BUY recommendation and a 12-month price target of €115,000. Bitcoin is at an inflection point, transitioning from a niche speculative asset to a recognized component of institutional portfolios. This shift is primarily driven by escalating macroeconomic uncertainty, the asset’s proven scarcity model, and maturing regulatory frameworks enabling broader access. We view Bitcoin as the premier digital store of value, positioned to capitalize on growing global demand for non-sovereign, censorship-resistant assets.

Why Now?

• Institutional Integration: The approval and widespread adoption of spot Bitcoin ETFs in major jurisdictions have significantly de-risked institutional access. This provides a regulated, familiar conduit for capital previously unable to participate directly, leading to sustained demand pressure.
• Macroeconomic Hedge: In an era characterized by persistent inflation concerns, unprecedented sovereign debt levels, and ongoing currency debasement by central banks globally, Bitcoin offers a compelling alternative to traditional inflation hedges. Its immutable supply cap of 21 million coins positions it as a superior inflation hedge compared to assets with variable supply.
• Post-Halving Dynamics: The recent halving event has further reduced the supply of new Bitcoin entering the market, exacerbating the supply shock against a backdrop of increasing demand. Historically, halvings have preceded significant price appreciation cycles, a pattern we expect to largely repeat, albeit with evolving market dynamics.
• Network Effect Maturation: Bitcoin’s network continues to expand in terms of users, developers, and infrastructure. Innovations such as the Lightning Network are improving its scalability and utility for micro-transactions, while increasing integration into the broader financial ecosystem enhances its legitimacy and utility.
• Evolving Price Cycles & Market Maturity: While Bitcoin remains volatile, its market structure is maturing. Increased institutional participation tends to lead to more sophisticated trading strategies and deeper liquidity, potentially tempering extreme volatility over time while still allowing for significant upside during bull phases. Models suggest a high probability of significant upside in the 2026-2027 timeframe, which we believe is underpinned by these structural shifts.

3. Investment Positives

We believe the following factors will drive Bitcoin’s price appreciation over the next 12-36 months, presented in order of impact:

• 1. Accelerating Institutional Adoption: Regulated investment vehicles, such as spot Bitcoin ETFs, have dramatically lowered the barrier for institutional capital. News flow consistently highlights increasing institutional demand. This structural shift provides a new, consistent buyer base, moving beyond retail-driven speculation. We expect this trend to continue as more wealth management platforms and pension funds gain regulatory clarity and internal approval to allocate to Bitcoin.
• 2. Macroeconomic Hedging Thesis Strengthening: Global monetary policy remains expansionary in many regions, fueling inflation concerns and currency debasement. Bitcoin’s fixed supply and decentralized nature position it as a powerful “digital gold” and a hedge against the erosion of purchasing power, particularly relevant for investors seeking alternatives to traditional safe havens. This narrative is reinforced by continued global money printing concerns projected into 2026-2027.
• 3. Post-Halving Supply Shock: The Bitcoin halving, which occurred recently, reduced the block reward for miners by 50%. This inherent supply-side constraint, occurring approximately every four years, significantly curtails the rate of new Bitcoin issuance. Historically, halvings have been strong catalysts for price appreciation due to the simple economics of reduced supply meeting sustained or increasing demand.
• 4. Expanding Network Effects and Infrastructure: The Bitcoin network continues to grow in terms of user adoption, transaction volume, and underlying technological development. Innovations like the Lightning Network improve scalability and transaction speed, enhancing Bitcoin’s utility beyond a mere store of value. Broader integration into payment systems and financial products expands its reach and utility, strengthening its overall value proposition through Metcalfe’s Law.
• 5. Progressive Regulatory Clarity: While regulation remains a key risk, there is a trend towards greater clarity in major economies. Establishing clear frameworks for digital assets can foster mainstream acceptance, attract more institutional players, and reduce uncertainty, ultimately supporting long-term price stability and growth.

4. Competitive/Peer Analysis

Bitcoin operates within a unique asset class, but its value proposition is often compared to traditional safe-haven assets and other prominent digital currencies.

Bitcoin vs. Gold (Digital Gold Narrative)

• Similarities:
  • Scarcity: Both possess inherent scarcity. Gold’s supply is limited by geological constraints and mining difficulty; Bitcoin’s supply is mathematically capped at 21 million coins.
  • Store of Value: Both are perceived as stores of value, particularly during periods of economic uncertainty or inflation.
  • Decentralization: Gold is a physical, decentralized asset, not controlled by any single government. Bitcoin is digitally decentralized, governed by a global network of participants.
• Differences:
  • Portability & Divisibility: Bitcoin is infinitely more portable and divisible (down to 1 satoshi) than physical gold, facilitating easier transactions and transfers across borders.
  • Verifiability: Bitcoin’s authenticity is cryptographically verifiable on its blockchain; gold requires physical assaying.
  • Inflation Hedge: Bitcoin’s transparent, fixed issuance schedule makes it a more predictable inflation hedge than gold, which can be subject to new discoveries or varying mining yields.
  • Technological Upside: Bitcoin benefits from network effects and ongoing technological innovation (e.g., Lightning Network), which gold lacks.
• Conclusion: Bitcoin presents a compelling “digital gold” alternative, offering superior characteristics in terms of portability, divisibility, and verifiable scarcity, making it increasingly attractive in the digital age.

Bitcoin vs. Ethereum (ETH)

• Similarities:
  • Decentralized Digital Assets: Both are foundational decentralized cryptocurrencies.
  • Network Effects: Both benefit from extensive developer communities and user bases.
• Differences:
  • Primary Use Case: Bitcoin is primarily designed as a store of value and a peer-to-peer electronic cash system. Ethereum is a platform for smart contracts, decentralized applications (dApps), and NFTs, serving as the backbone for the broader DeFi ecosystem.
  • Monetary Policy: Bitcoin has a fixed supply cap (21 million). Ethereum’s supply mechanism is more complex, involving issuance of new ETH and a burn mechanism (EIP-1559), aiming for net deflationary characteristics but without a hard cap.
  • Consensus Mechanism: Bitcoin uses Proof-of-Work (PoW). Ethereum transitioned to Proof-of-Stake (PoS), which has different energy consumption and decentralization implications.
  • Scalability: Ethereum’s roadmap focuses on scaling for high transaction throughput to support its dApp ecosystem. Bitcoin’s scalability is primarily addressed through layer-2 solutions like the Lightning Network.
• Conclusion: While both are critical digital assets, they serve distinct purposes. Bitcoin is the foundational “digital scarcity” asset, whereas Ethereum is the “world computer” enabling a vast ecosystem. They are complementary rather than direct competitors in their primary value propositions.

5. Estimates & Operating Assumptions (3-Year Forward Looking)

Our estimates reflect an environment of continued institutional adoption, progressive regulatory clarity, and the reinforcing effects of supply scarcity.

Bitcoin Price Forecasts (EUR)

• 12-Month Price Target (2025 Mid-Year): €115,000 (Based on current market momentum and post-halving dynamics)
• Year-End 2025: €130,000 (Continued momentum from institutional inflows and macro backdrop, estimate based on general knowledge 2024/2025)
• Year-End 2026: €150,000 (Sustained growth, potentially fueled by broader market adoption and “massive upset” scenarios highlighted in news, estimate based on general knowledge 2024/2025)
• Year-End 2027: €160,000 (Potential for market consolidation or further upward trend, depending on global liquidity and regulatory environment, estimate based on general knowledge 2024/2025)

Key Operating Assumptions:

• Institutional Adoption: We assume a continued acceleration of institutional capital allocation to Bitcoin. This includes increasing allocations from hedge funds, family offices, and potentially a broader range of sovereign wealth funds and corporate treasuries. Spot Bitcoin ETFs will act as a primary conduit.
• Retail Investor Engagement: While institutional flows dominate, we anticipate continued growth in retail investor participation, particularly in emerging markets where fiat currencies face significant devaluation. Accessibility through user-friendly platforms will remain key.
• Global Macroeconomic Environment: Our forecast assumes a sustained environment of moderate-to-high inflation concerns and continued expansionary monetary policies from major central banks. This backdrop enhances Bitcoin’s appeal as a deflationary asset. We also factor in the increasing likelihood of a global “money printing spree” in 2026-2027, as highlighted by news sources.
• Regulatory Landscape: We expect a gradual, albeit uneven, progression towards regulatory clarity in key jurisdictions (e.g., EU, UK, Asia). This includes clearer taxation rules, consumer protection measures, and frameworks for digital asset issuers. Outright bans in major economies are considered a low-probability, high-impact risk.
• Network Development: Ongoing improvements to Bitcoin’s underlying technology and ecosystem are assumed, including further development and adoption of Layer 2 solutions (e.g., Lightning Network) to enhance scalability and reduce transaction costs, making Bitcoin more viable for everyday use.
• Energy Consumption: We assume continued innovation in sustainable mining practices and increased utilization of renewable energy sources, addressing environmental concerns and supporting long-term adoption.
• Competition: While other cryptocurrencies exist, we assume Bitcoin maintains its dominant position as the primary digital store of value, with its brand recognition and network security acting as strong moats.

6. Valuation

Valuing Bitcoin presents unique challenges due to its nascent asset class status and lack of traditional cash flows. We employ a combination of quantitative models and qualitative factors, focusing on its scarcity, network effects, and market cycles.

Network Value to Transaction (NVT) Ratio

The NVT Ratio, analogous to a P/E ratio for a company, compares Bitcoin’s market capitalization (Network Value) to its daily on-chain transaction volume (Transactions). A high NVT can suggest overvaluation relative to network usage, while a low NVT suggests undervaluation. While Bitcoin’s current NVT ratio hovers in a range that suggests fair to slightly overvalued given its recent price appreciation, we anticipate increased utility and transaction throughput as institutional adoption grows. A rising baseline of transaction volume from ETFs and other institutional conduits could justify a higher NVT ratio in the coming cycle without implying overvaluation.

• Calculation: NVT Ratio = Market Capitalization / Daily Transaction Volume
• Current Implication: At current levels (€1485B Market Cap / €41B 24h Volume ≈ 36x), NVT suggests a stable to potentially stretched valuation compared to historical averages outside of bull market peaks. However, factoring in off-chain transactions (e.g., Lightning Network) and the increasing role of custodial solutions for large investors, the reported on-chain transaction volume may understate true economic activity, providing latent support for a higher NVT.

Stock-to-Flow (S2F) Model

The Stock-to-Flow model, popularized by PlanB, values Bitcoin based on its scarcity. It calculates the ratio of existing supply (Stock) to newly minted supply (Flow). Assets with high stock-to-flow ratios (i.e., high scarcity) tend to be more valuable. Bitcoin’s halving events dramatically reduce its flow, inherently increasing its stock-to-flow ratio and, historically, correlating with significant price increases. While not a perfect predictive tool, S2F highlights Bitcoin’s core value proposition of verifiable scarcity. Post-halving, the S2F model implies significantly higher price floors and potential peaks in subsequent cycles, aligning with our bullish outlook for 2025-2027.

• Principle: Scarcity drives value. As the flow of new Bitcoin decreases post-halving, its relative scarcity increases.
• Implication: The model suggests prices significantly above current levels in the post-halving cycle. While specific price targets from the S2F model vary and are subject to debate, the underlying principle of scarcity-driven value remains a cornerstone of Bitcoin’s investment thesis.

Network Effects (Metcalfe’s Law)

Metcalfe’s Law states that the value of a telecommunications network is proportional to the square of the number of connected users of the system (N^2). Applied to Bitcoin, the value of the network increases exponentially as more users, developers, and economic activity are added. Bitcoin continues to demonstrate robust network growth:

• User Adoption: Global Bitcoin wallet addresses and active users are steadily climbing.
• Developer Activity: A vibrant open-source developer community continually enhances the protocol and its ecosystem.
• Infrastructure: Expansion of mining infrastructure, payment processors, custodial services, and layer-2 solutions like the Lightning Network.
• Conclusion: The reinforcing cycle of increased adoption leading to greater utility and value, which in turn attracts more users, underpins Bitcoin’s long-term growth trajectory and supports a higher valuation.

Valuation Conclusion & 12-Month Price Target Derivation:

Our 12-month price target of €115,000 reflects a conservative estimate of Bitcoin’s potential, considering the confluence of these valuation drivers. It implies a continued, yet non-linear, appreciation from current levels, driven by:

• Sustained institutional capital inflows via ETFs and other regulated products.
• The full impact of the post-halving supply shock becoming evident in market prices.
• Growing acknowledgment of Bitcoin’s role as a long-term macro hedge against global monetary policies.
• Continued expansion and maturation of the Bitcoin network and its surrounding ecosystem.

This target represents a significant upside potential, underpinned by fundamental shifts in market structure and demand, rather than purely speculative fervor.

7. Key Risks

Investing in Bitcoin carries inherent risks, which could impede its growth trajectory or lead to price declines.

• Regulatory Scrutiny and Prohibitions: Despite recent positive developments, the global regulatory landscape for cryptocurrencies remains fragmented and uncertain. Governments could impose stricter regulations, outright bans, or introduce unfavorable tax policies, particularly if Bitcoin is perceived as a threat to fiat currencies or national security.
• Price Volatility: Bitcoin is historically a highly volatile asset. Sharp price swings are common and can be influenced by macroeconomic events, regulatory news, market sentiment, and large whale movements. This volatility may deter risk-averse investors and can lead to significant capital losses.
• Technological Risks: While the Bitcoin protocol has proven resilient, risks remain. These include potential undiscovered vulnerabilities in the core code, security breaches of exchanges or custodial services, or the emergence of quantum computing that could theoretically break current cryptographic standards (though this is a long-term, speculative risk).
• Competition from Other Digital Assets: While Bitcoin holds a dominant position as a store of value, other cryptocurrencies and blockchain platforms continue to innovate. While not direct competitors for Bitcoin’s core use case, significant advancements or market share shifts by alternative assets could dilute overall crypto market attention or capital.
• Macroeconomic Downturns: In a severe global economic recession or financial crisis, investors might liquidate riskier assets, including Bitcoin, to seek liquidity or reallocate to traditional safe havens. Despite its “digital gold” narrative, Bitcoin has shown correlation with broader risk-on assets during periods of extreme market stress.
• Environmental Concerns: The energy consumption associated with Bitcoin’s Proof-of-Work mining continues to be a point of contention. Increased pressure from environmental groups or governments could lead to regulatory action or negative public sentiment, impacting adoption.
• Liquidity and Market Manipulation: Despite growing institutional participation, aspects of the cryptocurrency market can still be susceptible to market manipulation due to concentrated ownership (“whales”) and less robust regulatory oversight compared to traditional markets.

8. Appendix

Methodology Notes

Our analysis utilizes a multi-faceted approach, combining quantitative models (e.g., NVT ratio, Stock-to-Flow), qualitative assessments of market dynamics (institutional adoption, macroeconomic trends, network effects), and insights from current market news and expert consensus. Price forecasts and operating assumptions are estimates based on our assessment of the current environment and projected trends, given the inherent uncertainties of forecasting in a rapidly evolving asset class.

Disclaimer

This report is for informational purposes only and does not constitute investment advice. Investment in cryptocurrencies involves substantial risk of loss and is not suitable for every investor. The value of investments and the income derived from them can go down as well as up, and you may not get back the full amount you invested. Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future results.

AI-Generated Content Disclosure

This report has been generated by an Artificial Intelligence model based on the provided live market data, news, and specific output requirements. While every effort has been made to ensure accuracy and adherence to instructions, this content should be reviewed and verified by a human expert before making any investment decisions.

This report may contain AI-assisted analysis or be generated entirely by AI, which processes market data from publicly available sources for which altii accepts no responsibility for its accuracy. We strongly advise against using this report as a basis for investment decisions.